Details
-
- Environment:
- -
Issue Links
| Depends | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Status | New [ 10000 ] | Open [ 10002 ] |
| Priority | Minor [ 4 ] | |
| Assignee | Christophe DENEUX [ cdeneux ] | Victor NOËL [ vnoel ] |
| Status | Open [ 10002 ] | In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Link | This issue blocks PETALSDISTRIB-146 [ PETALSDISTRIB-146 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 10003 ] | Resolved [ 10004 ] |
| Fix Version/s | 5.0.1 [ 10579 ] | |
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] |
| Description |
In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange that has already timed out.
Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider. |
In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange (sent with sendSync) that has already timed out.
Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider. See also |
| Transition | Status Change Time | Execution Times | Last Executer | Last Execution Date | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
