Petals ESB Container

When receiving an answer to a timed out exchange, send an error back to the sender if possible

Details

  • Type: Improvement Request Improvement Request
  • Status: Resolved Resolved
  • Priority: Minor Minor
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 5.0.0
  • Fix Version/s: 5.0.1
  • Component/s: Router
  • Security Level: Public
  • Description:
    Hide

    In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange (sent with sendSync) that has already timed out.

    Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider.

    See also PETALSCDK-160.

    Show
    In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange (sent with sendSync) that has already timed out. Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider. See also PETALSCDK-160.
  • Environment:
    -

Issue Links

Activity

Victor NOËL made changes - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:35:34 +0100
Field Original Value New Value
Status New [ 10000 ] Open [ 10002 ]
Priority Minor [ 4 ]
Assignee Christophe DENEUX [ cdeneux ] Victor NOËL [ vnoel ]
Victor NOËL made changes - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:35:37 +0100
Status Open [ 10002 ] In Progress [ 10003 ]
Victor NOËL made changes - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:37:25 +0100
Link This issue blocks PETALSDISTRIB-146 [ PETALSDISTRIB-146 ]
Victor NOËL made changes - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:38:22 +0100
Status In Progress [ 10003 ] Resolved [ 10004 ]
Fix Version/s 5.0.1 [ 10579 ]
Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
Victor NOËL made changes - Wed, 27 Jan 2016 - 17:00:47 +0100
Description In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange that has already timed out.

Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider.
In order to ease diagnostics, in particular in a distributed setting, it would make sense to send back an error to the sender of an answer to an exchange (sent with sendSync) that has already timed out.

Currently, the answer is simply ignored. With this change, the provider would get an error and it would reduce the chance of incoherent knowledge between consumer and provider.

See also PETALSCDK-160.
Transition Status Change Time Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
New New Open Open
9s
1
Victor NOËL
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:35:34 +0100
Open Open In Progress In Progress
3s
1
Victor NOËL
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:35:37 +0100
In Progress In Progress Resolved Resolved
2m 45s
1
Victor NOËL
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:38:22 +0100



People

Dates

  • Created:
    Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:35:25 +0100
    Updated:
    Wed, 27 Jan 2016 - 17:00:47 +0100
    Resolved:
    Mon, 11 Jan 2016 - 15:38:22 +0100