Petals ESB Container

'ComponentLifeCycle' should be referenced inside the 'ContainerService' instead of the 'AdminService'

Details

  • Description:
    Hide

    Nowadays, 'ComponentLifeCycle' are referenced inside the 'AdminService'. Moreover, since PETALSESBCONT-288, no component of the composite 'Container' should be referenced by an external component.

    It is better to bind them to the ContainerService as an interface collection.

    Show
    Nowadays, 'ComponentLifeCycle' are referenced inside the 'AdminService'. Moreover, since PETALSESBCONT-288, no component of the composite 'Container' should be referenced by an external component. It is better to bind them to the ContainerService as an interface collection.
  • Environment:
    -

Issue Links

Depends

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Christophe DENEUX made changes - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 17:59:04 +0100
Field Original Value New Value
Status New [ 10000 ] Open [ 10002 ]
Priority Major [ 3 ]
Christophe DENEUX made changes - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 17:59:07 +0100
Status Open [ 10002 ] In Progress [ 10003 ]
Hide
Permalink
Christophe DENEUX added a comment - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 18:59:42 +0100

'ComponentLifeCycle' are now referenced in 'ContainerService'. Done in trunk.
But no Fractal binding has been used because it does not work. An error occurs when removing the binding. It's strange, because for 'Installer' that works fine. Perhaps a bug in Fractal

Show
Christophe DENEUX added a comment - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 18:59:42 +0100 'ComponentLifeCycle' are now referenced in 'ContainerService'. Done in trunk. But no Fractal binding has been used because it does not work. An error occurs when removing the binding. It's strange, because for 'Installer' that works fine. Perhaps a bug in Fractal
Christophe DENEUX made changes - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 18:59:42 +0100
Status In Progress [ 10003 ] Resolved [ 10004 ]
Fix Version/s 4.2.1 [ 10413 ]
Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
Christophe DENEUX made changes - Wed, 12 Feb 2014 - 10:24:31 +0100
Link This issue blocks PETALSESBCONT-276 [ PETALSESBCONT-276 ]
Christophe DENEUX made changes - Wed, 12 Feb 2014 - 10:24:53 +0100
Link This issue depends on PETALSESBCONT-288 [ PETALSESBCONT-288 ]
Hide
Permalink
Victor NOËL added a comment - Fri, 20 Mar 2015 - 11:57:42 +0100

That last point has been fixed in r36899 following the resolution of PETALSESBCONT-318.

Show
Victor NOËL added a comment - Fri, 20 Mar 2015 - 11:57:42 +0100 That last point has been fixed in r36899 following the resolution of PETALSESBCONT-318.
Transition Status Change Time Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
New New Open Open
16s
1
Christophe DENEUX
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 17:59:04 +0100
Open Open In Progress In Progress
3s
1
Christophe DENEUX
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 17:59:07 +0100
In Progress In Progress Resolved Resolved
1h
1
Christophe DENEUX
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 18:59:42 +0100



People

Dates

  • Created:
    Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 17:58:48 +0100
    Updated:
    Fri, 20 Mar 2015 - 11:57:42 +0100
    Resolved:
    Tue, 11 Feb 2014 - 18:59:42 +0100
Atlassian JIRA (v4.1.2#531) | Report a problem | Request a feature | Contact administrators
Powered by a free Atlassian JIRA open source license for Petals ESB. Try JIRA - bug tracking software for your team.